But from where? The only answers that financial experts propose will serve the banks, not the people.
Wednesday, January 28, 2009
Friday, January 23, 2009
Thursday, January 22, 2009
No Choice
Stawberry fields in Watsonville CA, are highly poisoned for crop of beautiful fruit.
The clear and present truth of America's future lays in the use of technology and expertise to feed the world, and stop the ruination and despoiling the natural landscape into farm land. If nothing else, the kind of climate change that has become apparent in the west of America, is attributed to the property rights of farming, over-grazing and depletion of aquifer. Water is not from on high nor is it from beneath the earth, but is a circular flow from earth through vegetation and forestation into the sky, and return. The most fundamental balance has been abrogated by exploitation with little hope of salvation.
Water Rights, for farming but not for the Public Good.
The imperative of progress can disallow the continuation of what is in effect. Almost universal in societies all over the world is farming. Soil depletion and the opposite solution of boosting the capability to produce causes fertilizer residue, herbicide and pesticide run-off into waterways, seas, and ocean. We turn a blind eye upon our excesses, and favor those who destroy and cause damage to untold people.
Changing this course that has occupied man since before history is formidable. Yet, the twentieth century has been a period of endings and beginnings. Foremost, the civilization fought the replacement of the horse by gas driven vehicles, and ended for practical purposes the dependence on horses. Oil & gas is another phase, and that too shall end, by the imperative, not of oil depletion, by by replacement and universality. Ideas and theories too are up for grabs, and the mind of mankind can turn on a dime in belief systems. Is it so hard to believe that Mohammed was a warrior, and that Militant Muslims, hundreds of years later, still are occupied by that methodology? No matter how passive the Koran?
We believe in what is, and are skeptical and reject what will be. At the same time, we treat visionaries as entertainment, loving to hear of the fabulous, but mindful that we are pursuing goodness by maintaining belief. The car you see bearing down upon you will hit you, so you better step aside. Open your mind. Believe not in what you are told but what your body tells you, your mind will save you, you are a creator and that next moment of stepping aside, the action, is because you listened to you. Spirituality is what is evident.
The clear and present truth of America's future lays in the use of technology and expertise to feed the world, and stop the ruination and despoiling the natural landscape into farm land. If nothing else, the kind of climate change that has become apparent in the west of America, is attributed to the property rights of farming, over-grazing and depletion of aquifer. Water is not from on high nor is it from beneath the earth, but is a circular flow from earth through vegetation and forestation into the sky, and return. The most fundamental balance has been abrogated by exploitation with little hope of salvation.
Water Rights, for farming but not for the Public Good.
The imperative of progress can disallow the continuation of what is in effect. Almost universal in societies all over the world is farming. Soil depletion and the opposite solution of boosting the capability to produce causes fertilizer residue, herbicide and pesticide run-off into waterways, seas, and ocean. We turn a blind eye upon our excesses, and favor those who destroy and cause damage to untold people.
Changing this course that has occupied man since before history is formidable. Yet, the twentieth century has been a period of endings and beginnings. Foremost, the civilization fought the replacement of the horse by gas driven vehicles, and ended for practical purposes the dependence on horses. Oil & gas is another phase, and that too shall end, by the imperative, not of oil depletion, by by replacement and universality. Ideas and theories too are up for grabs, and the mind of mankind can turn on a dime in belief systems. Is it so hard to believe that Mohammed was a warrior, and that Militant Muslims, hundreds of years later, still are occupied by that methodology? No matter how passive the Koran?
We believe in what is, and are skeptical and reject what will be. At the same time, we treat visionaries as entertainment, loving to hear of the fabulous, but mindful that we are pursuing goodness by maintaining belief. The car you see bearing down upon you will hit you, so you better step aside. Open your mind. Believe not in what you are told but what your body tells you, your mind will save you, you are a creator and that next moment of stepping aside, the action, is because you listened to you. Spirituality is what is evident.
Friday, January 16, 2009
The Creative Method
For years, I've watched myself think in creative terms, but to no great achievement, rather an endless tale of ideas that inevitably bump against the hard wall of society's institution. To think in these terms, one must need be skeptical, then dimensional because in order to create a new solution, one of potential, then shuffling the parts around against hierarchy, in a sense anarchy, all parts equal, gives then a potential new vision. That, is dimensional, and not all people think in terms of structure, or architecture, i.e., do you enter a building from the ground level, or from the middle or top level?
Today, the real world is seen in brutal reality, the passage is, not what might be or would be, and not an oasis. Change is traumatic, decisive, complete. The dead are dead, the new day is without the dead, leaving the memory and legacy, but, taking up a new hand of cards. Can we reinterpret the intent, finesse the stakes, or live by the old intent, watch the eroding principal. We see it in hand or through the sources, and the daily reality is seen as spin, what the media would have you believe, usually the facts are expressed brutally, and these become quicksand beneath our feet.
Media's interest is in security, because it is an island of repose, something all need to gain perspective on life. But as Media does not simply inform, only nature does in the search for meaning through science or philosophy or other sources, Media directs attention to destabilizing thoughts, obsessive vernacular, spurious attention to non-productivity, and weakness. Strength comes from doing, proceeding onwards, casting asides doubts, taking-up the challenge.
If you believe media, then it is antithetical to being creative, for that lies in spiritual truth, or that which is evident to you. In Media we live winning or losing or being a variety of emotions through others doing, like sports, or the illusion of actions, in created scenarios. The Bible was the scenario of yesterday, man needs scenarios like food and water, or not just needs, uses them to expand or fill the mind. But the activity of being is doing, and this is an example of finding spiritual truth, taken before and during and after an operation to rehabilitate my damaged hands.
The point is that the impossible is possible, only that we must move out media network thinking, those sources that tell us what we need to think, and think for ourselves. The idea is the idea we are presented everyday of our life, and discard. Sometimes, the creative spirit does just what it is supposed to do, create a new life!
The market truth is that anything must be sold, and to that end it must be acceptable to the understanding of the market. New ideas can be grasped, though it must be the right time, and people are on that kind of a learning track. For example, the great leap from PC-dom, has been made by hand-helds, and ipods, and cell systems (Apple) to what? The future of all that has been. Bringing along society is very much where we are. The world has leaped forward by absolute, nearly, communication, where people are autonomous, nearly, in problem solving (information=Google). In fact, so much so, we wonder at the ineptitude of the world states, and conflict, and differences, but maybe that's a naive American view... but I think, hardly not.
The objective is to free-up old intent, not live by the word, re-interpret the word continuously. The world is dominated by moneyed interests that are governed by bodies that are influenced by the established moneyed interests. Public Good, on the other hand, is in the same boat, floundering in the seas after the last empire has sunk, still breathing, eating, living the old institutions. Bodies simply cannot easily change because of consensus, while money is actually the fuel that drives innovation, and by moneyed interests. Still, the boat lurches and is wobbling because of various other interests, like religion, farming, oil, preservation, any and all things that want it to stay the same because these enjoy power and money, quite simply.
Imagine the energy of a million cars driving around cities at high speeds, and forget that just you are in a car with your life of questions and solutions, your cell, your family, your business, and see that a million cars are about you, streaming with similar thoughts, wonder at it. Have we come so far from hunting? Yes probably, because we think in terms of good, and why are we not so, or how do we get it? Or we think, how good or bad we are individually, and ignore the power of being together. We loved Kings, they could be good or bad and always noble, and now we love Presidents because they can lift us from our indolence, and consumption, fortify our thoughts, or incite our anger, and help us believe the goodness and mercy of the democratic revolution.
Throw your hands down and celebrate being, then beware because you'll come smack-up against the more powerful meaning of old, just past, yesterday's institutional belief systems, like living 'according to the founding fathers.' Nothing is worse for health, and the future, so avoid it, brush it off your shoulder, and survey all that you are and breathe deep the new life, your new life. The communities will not die away, they are constantly re-furnished by humans who fit into the roles as old members die away. Their life is in a society of skeletons, constantly un-reinvented, lived intermediably for the good of nothing except their power in old pharaohs clothing, -mummified.
Creative lives are a balance of old and new, for we are mammals, and grow from families, and give our love and attention to our past in this profound way, but look-out, make sure that the future is your pleasure, your investigation, your answer.
Today, the real world is seen in brutal reality, the passage is, not what might be or would be, and not an oasis. Change is traumatic, decisive, complete. The dead are dead, the new day is without the dead, leaving the memory and legacy, but, taking up a new hand of cards. Can we reinterpret the intent, finesse the stakes, or live by the old intent, watch the eroding principal. We see it in hand or through the sources, and the daily reality is seen as spin, what the media would have you believe, usually the facts are expressed brutally, and these become quicksand beneath our feet.
Media's interest is in security, because it is an island of repose, something all need to gain perspective on life. But as Media does not simply inform, only nature does in the search for meaning through science or philosophy or other sources, Media directs attention to destabilizing thoughts, obsessive vernacular, spurious attention to non-productivity, and weakness. Strength comes from doing, proceeding onwards, casting asides doubts, taking-up the challenge.
If you believe media, then it is antithetical to being creative, for that lies in spiritual truth, or that which is evident to you. In Media we live winning or losing or being a variety of emotions through others doing, like sports, or the illusion of actions, in created scenarios. The Bible was the scenario of yesterday, man needs scenarios like food and water, or not just needs, uses them to expand or fill the mind. But the activity of being is doing, and this is an example of finding spiritual truth, taken before and during and after an operation to rehabilitate my damaged hands.
The point is that the impossible is possible, only that we must move out media network thinking, those sources that tell us what we need to think, and think for ourselves. The idea is the idea we are presented everyday of our life, and discard. Sometimes, the creative spirit does just what it is supposed to do, create a new life!
The market truth is that anything must be sold, and to that end it must be acceptable to the understanding of the market. New ideas can be grasped, though it must be the right time, and people are on that kind of a learning track. For example, the great leap from PC-dom, has been made by hand-helds, and ipods, and cell systems (Apple) to what? The future of all that has been. Bringing along society is very much where we are. The world has leaped forward by absolute, nearly, communication, where people are autonomous, nearly, in problem solving (information=Google). In fact, so much so, we wonder at the ineptitude of the world states, and conflict, and differences, but maybe that's a naive American view... but I think, hardly not.
The objective is to free-up old intent, not live by the word, re-interpret the word continuously. The world is dominated by moneyed interests that are governed by bodies that are influenced by the established moneyed interests. Public Good, on the other hand, is in the same boat, floundering in the seas after the last empire has sunk, still breathing, eating, living the old institutions. Bodies simply cannot easily change because of consensus, while money is actually the fuel that drives innovation, and by moneyed interests. Still, the boat lurches and is wobbling because of various other interests, like religion, farming, oil, preservation, any and all things that want it to stay the same because these enjoy power and money, quite simply.
Imagine the energy of a million cars driving around cities at high speeds, and forget that just you are in a car with your life of questions and solutions, your cell, your family, your business, and see that a million cars are about you, streaming with similar thoughts, wonder at it. Have we come so far from hunting? Yes probably, because we think in terms of good, and why are we not so, or how do we get it? Or we think, how good or bad we are individually, and ignore the power of being together. We loved Kings, they could be good or bad and always noble, and now we love Presidents because they can lift us from our indolence, and consumption, fortify our thoughts, or incite our anger, and help us believe the goodness and mercy of the democratic revolution.
Throw your hands down and celebrate being, then beware because you'll come smack-up against the more powerful meaning of old, just past, yesterday's institutional belief systems, like living 'according to the founding fathers.' Nothing is worse for health, and the future, so avoid it, brush it off your shoulder, and survey all that you are and breathe deep the new life, your new life. The communities will not die away, they are constantly re-furnished by humans who fit into the roles as old members die away. Their life is in a society of skeletons, constantly un-reinvented, lived intermediably for the good of nothing except their power in old pharaohs clothing, -mummified.
Creative lives are a balance of old and new, for we are mammals, and grow from families, and give our love and attention to our past in this profound way, but look-out, make sure that the future is your pleasure, your investigation, your answer.
Wednesday, January 14, 2009
Visions
The world synches in thinks. Yes, the function is clear and everything must fall into line, and work like everything else. Nothing is allowed if it does not work for money. Even charity is a money function. Jesus would be looked upon as an illogic in todays traffic. The public good is second to making money because money, and NOT benefits to society, is a motivator, and because the realm is money. Benefits may play in a political sense, but the law governing it is money.
Innovation and change are allowed if they mean money to someone, mostly to corporations, which is simply the legal function of doing/making for money. After that, there is the insurance concerns, the inevitable loss is protected, and the service then falls into the function of money.
My idea is to build a huge vertical farm over Alcatraz (an island in San Francisco Bay) is based on a Vertical Farm proposal by a visionary professor at Columbia University. Also, in my passion for real estate, mI have a predilection for poisoned property, something seen as having no value (STM, standard mode of thinking) can be recreated. Although Alctraz is under the protection of National Park System, and many will be offended at rhe loss of a prison and fort, I would quickly point-out that The Golden Gate Bridge was built over an historic fort, and that progress must be debated on the highest level for projecting ourselves out of an historical paradigm in the exigencies of the future.
My process is creativity. (Creativity ALWAYS bumps up against the normal view, what it is that most people think and established as a way. The fundamental process of society is to institutionalize, in order for security to be that things don't change. Hence, growth is governed by restraint. See POST after....)
Systems can be constructed to "manufacture" food with little harm to the environment, as contrasted to the decimation of landscape, waters and aquifers, poisoning of fertilizers and herbicides and pesticides, brought-on by flat farming. The current practice has been functioning for thousands of years, and now presses against natural limitations, there is no more land to destroy for crops that may or may not come in.
The fact that the need and the exploitation of land to fill that need is so predominate, and based upon the free access, or low cost, use of land, that it forms an apparent truth, -one that is essentially unquestioned by society. Does over-grazing serve the public, or the farmers, and why does the public suffer the consequences, i.e., bad weather, as if it comes on high, as from God, or another sorce looking down upon mankind.
Rain water comes from the body(earth), not the sky.
Furthermore, there is indication that de-forestation, over grazing, huge land tracts removed from natural vegetation will affect the rainfall, which relies on the circular passage of water through vegetation to the sky, bringing rain, fulfilling the aquifer. If this is not true, then why do crops frequently fail? The natural balance is upset, on a massive scale.
The Public Good in this case is second to the farming concerns, but more so, second to the rigidity of farming practice, as something that cannot be changed except by further ruination of earth and water by overwhelming cataclysm. The Public is given the good of food, hence, all goes for food, and farming. Lost is the symbiosis of man and earth, seen in simpler times as feeding the mouths, now seen as, market grabbing, or commodity manipulation. The elements, -wind, sun, rainwater, support as much as ravage farming. The advantages of hot house farming, enclosed from the elements, far outweigh (in yield versus ruination) the continued exploitation of the Public's good.
America has been a force in the green revolution, resulting in an amazing surge in farming output in the last century to feed the world. Now, by extending our knowledge and power to change how we grow essential foodstuff throughout the world, which now feeds itself by the established practice, America can create new effective ways to grow food, -and, reverse the balance of destroying natural landscape. If rain forest decimation of Brazil is any indication, the world is out of control and will suffer changing weather patterns as a result. Rain is essential to flat field farming, change the body of earth, you change the weather.
My proposal is a creative aspiration. For California to build a model Vertical Farm hemisphere in San Francisco Bay would produce food, using sun and rain and sea breezes, and draw water from drainage from the land nearby, but more than that, it would be an inspirational monument to all who see it. Mankind needs to feed itself, yet flat farming has reached a destructive level. We cannot afford to accommodate ruination out of fear. We need be creative with outr resources.
The Growth of Global Farming would glow in the night, an icon of productivity under the growth design of man's mind. It would be a presence in the day, a radiant symbol of the Future, a sun to human efforts. The yield would be a beginning, of this experiment, and of thousands yet to be built in every city in the world. In the midst of the city, San Francisco, California, in the greatest of all farm states, it will be the lamp of the future, as once held by the Statue of Liberty, and shine upon all the world. The intent of America is now to be committed to show the way for all people to feed themselves.
Innovation and change are allowed if they mean money to someone, mostly to corporations, which is simply the legal function of doing/making for money. After that, there is the insurance concerns, the inevitable loss is protected, and the service then falls into the function of money.
My idea is to build a huge vertical farm over Alcatraz (an island in San Francisco Bay) is based on a Vertical Farm proposal by a visionary professor at Columbia University. Also, in my passion for real estate, mI have a predilection for poisoned property, something seen as having no value (STM, standard mode of thinking) can be recreated. Although Alctraz is under the protection of National Park System, and many will be offended at rhe loss of a prison and fort, I would quickly point-out that The Golden Gate Bridge was built over an historic fort, and that progress must be debated on the highest level for projecting ourselves out of an historical paradigm in the exigencies of the future.
My process is creativity. (Creativity ALWAYS bumps up against the normal view, what it is that most people think and established as a way. The fundamental process of society is to institutionalize, in order for security to be that things don't change. Hence, growth is governed by restraint. See POST after....)
Systems can be constructed to "manufacture" food with little harm to the environment, as contrasted to the decimation of landscape, waters and aquifers, poisoning of fertilizers and herbicides and pesticides, brought-on by flat farming. The current practice has been functioning for thousands of years, and now presses against natural limitations, there is no more land to destroy for crops that may or may not come in.
The fact that the need and the exploitation of land to fill that need is so predominate, and based upon the free access, or low cost, use of land, that it forms an apparent truth, -one that is essentially unquestioned by society. Does over-grazing serve the public, or the farmers, and why does the public suffer the consequences, i.e., bad weather, as if it comes on high, as from God, or another sorce looking down upon mankind.
Rain water comes from the body(earth), not the sky.
Furthermore, there is indication that de-forestation, over grazing, huge land tracts removed from natural vegetation will affect the rainfall, which relies on the circular passage of water through vegetation to the sky, bringing rain, fulfilling the aquifer. If this is not true, then why do crops frequently fail? The natural balance is upset, on a massive scale.
The Public Good in this case is second to the farming concerns, but more so, second to the rigidity of farming practice, as something that cannot be changed except by further ruination of earth and water by overwhelming cataclysm. The Public is given the good of food, hence, all goes for food, and farming. Lost is the symbiosis of man and earth, seen in simpler times as feeding the mouths, now seen as, market grabbing, or commodity manipulation. The elements, -wind, sun, rainwater, support as much as ravage farming. The advantages of hot house farming, enclosed from the elements, far outweigh (in yield versus ruination) the continued exploitation of the Public's good.
America has been a force in the green revolution, resulting in an amazing surge in farming output in the last century to feed the world. Now, by extending our knowledge and power to change how we grow essential foodstuff throughout the world, which now feeds itself by the established practice, America can create new effective ways to grow food, -and, reverse the balance of destroying natural landscape. If rain forest decimation of Brazil is any indication, the world is out of control and will suffer changing weather patterns as a result. Rain is essential to flat field farming, change the body of earth, you change the weather.
My proposal is a creative aspiration. For California to build a model Vertical Farm hemisphere in San Francisco Bay would produce food, using sun and rain and sea breezes, and draw water from drainage from the land nearby, but more than that, it would be an inspirational monument to all who see it. Mankind needs to feed itself, yet flat farming has reached a destructive level. We cannot afford to accommodate ruination out of fear. We need be creative with outr resources.
The Growth of Global Farming would glow in the night, an icon of productivity under the growth design of man's mind. It would be a presence in the day, a radiant symbol of the Future, a sun to human efforts. The yield would be a beginning, of this experiment, and of thousands yet to be built in every city in the world. In the midst of the city, San Francisco, California, in the greatest of all farm states, it will be the lamp of the future, as once held by the Statue of Liberty, and shine upon all the world. The intent of America is now to be committed to show the way for all people to feed themselves.
Wednesday, January 07, 2009
Seeing the Future
At all times, society runs according to the institution at hand, and in the so-called free press state of democracy, the structure is constantly being undermined to proof the validity. Natural forces play more powerfully than natural disasters, meaning of course, the political currents preponderate even when they steer the boat over the falls. The current paradigm has been in effect for centuries, feeding the people, or flat farming the world into extinction. Now we have a situation that requires surgery, for all health can degenerate into the hands of the cut-throat, where the miracle of life is taken over by the organism in healing the mind. The times need a visionary, and one is at hand. Dickson Despommier
My travels display how my mind works in turning over variables looking for creative answers, so given the hard evidence of the essays in Vertical Farm dot com, I wonder to what degree is the truth. How could so many people be wrong at one time? Does the world really believe that money and wealth are the central protected rights of the few, when so many people are at the edge of night?
I live in Walla Walla, Washington, where floods dumped alluvial soil as deep as six feet in an area one hundred miles square. Treeless, the landscape is farmed for wheat, as purely superficial crop as can be seen for miles and miles. Feeding people is not the issue, commodity grabbing wealth is the only fact, and farmers can count profit years on fingers of one hand.
I traveled to Panama, where the landscape is farmed, but now exploited by northern countries for resort atmosphere. Few places suggest more potential for vertical farms as they are constructing resort towers for the wealthy, and crushing the people from the land.
Most recently, I am in San Francisco, the state that rivals America is scope as an independent food producer, the Governor is nothing short of king or president. But like all things, we must answer to the institution, the flat farmers are supreme in productivity, and also in closing the landscape to extinction.
To Governor Schwarzenegger:
The island of Alcatraz Prison is a perfect site for the construction and modeling of a new era, that is, Vertical Farming. Visionary Dickson Despommier of Columbia University has made an outline of the impending problem of world farming requirements, reducing an area the size of Brazil to flatland farming, on this website,
http://www.verticalfarm.com/
Read the two Essays. He has been publicized, but the time has come for the focusing of intelligence to formulate and model other kinds of farming potential, that is sustainable.
California is of course, the best and worst of farming and subsidiary problems, -water. I request an opportunity to bring Mr. Despommier to meet with the Governor, and discuss the potential for California to be the spawning ground for a technology that will be needed throughout the world, and as well, the benefits which defy the Political State.
The project idea is to build a Verti-sphere over Alcatraz, that is clear to the sun and full of a productivity of food, fired by solar, and fed by water from the sewers of the city. To build something that does not despoil the land, raped the aquifers, create no pollution, and drain no herbicides into the ocean. In short, A NUCLEAR REACTOR without plutonium that does not burn life to embers but gives life a method, and a new beginning.
Preposterous as the mind functions, the potential is to flagrantly build a symbol of the future mid-bay San Francisco, that will illuminate the minds of all who see it, and many will come to see it, and to cast a light over all mankind.
My travels display how my mind works in turning over variables looking for creative answers, so given the hard evidence of the essays in Vertical Farm dot com, I wonder to what degree is the truth. How could so many people be wrong at one time? Does the world really believe that money and wealth are the central protected rights of the few, when so many people are at the edge of night?
I live in Walla Walla, Washington, where floods dumped alluvial soil as deep as six feet in an area one hundred miles square. Treeless, the landscape is farmed for wheat, as purely superficial crop as can be seen for miles and miles. Feeding people is not the issue, commodity grabbing wealth is the only fact, and farmers can count profit years on fingers of one hand.
I traveled to Panama, where the landscape is farmed, but now exploited by northern countries for resort atmosphere. Few places suggest more potential for vertical farms as they are constructing resort towers for the wealthy, and crushing the people from the land.
Most recently, I am in San Francisco, the state that rivals America is scope as an independent food producer, the Governor is nothing short of king or president. But like all things, we must answer to the institution, the flat farmers are supreme in productivity, and also in closing the landscape to extinction.
To Governor Schwarzenegger:
The island of Alcatraz Prison is a perfect site for the construction and modeling of a new era, that is, Vertical Farming. Visionary Dickson Despommier of Columbia University has made an outline of the impending problem of world farming requirements, reducing an area the size of Brazil to flatland farming, on this website,
http://www.verticalfarm.com/
Read the two Essays. He has been publicized, but the time has come for the focusing of intelligence to formulate and model other kinds of farming potential, that is sustainable.
California is of course, the best and worst of farming and subsidiary problems, -water. I request an opportunity to bring Mr. Despommier to meet with the Governor, and discuss the potential for California to be the spawning ground for a technology that will be needed throughout the world, and as well, the benefits which defy the Political State.
The project idea is to build a Verti-sphere over Alcatraz, that is clear to the sun and full of a productivity of food, fired by solar, and fed by water from the sewers of the city. To build something that does not despoil the land, raped the aquifers, create no pollution, and drain no herbicides into the ocean. In short, A NUCLEAR REACTOR without plutonium that does not burn life to embers but gives life a method, and a new beginning.
Preposterous as the mind functions, the potential is to flagrantly build a symbol of the future mid-bay San Francisco, that will illuminate the minds of all who see it, and many will come to see it, and to cast a light over all mankind.
Thursday, January 01, 2009
Resolution
Searching for understanding, and trying to get it down as video,
and not words, is the only resolution I have made
in anticipation of another great year, 2009 AD.
Commenting on NYTimes opinion: Surfin Bush
"Rich is another columnist who doesn't need to be read to understand. Coagulating anger is simply turning the table the wrong way. Bush is merely a guidepost in Time of changes that had to come as result of a generation of aggressive contemporary living and investing (the smaller sense of an obtuse word for self-interest or greed) fueled by exploitation and coffee. We are the Fools, not Bush, because we fail to recognize the urgency of our needs, feeding a planet. The Times is at the pinnacle of our society in anger manipulation, and a low point in self-realization."
and not words, is the only resolution I have made
in anticipation of another great year, 2009 AD.
Surfing the Future
Commenting on NYTimes opinion: Surfin Bush
"Rich is another columnist who doesn't need to be read to understand. Coagulating anger is simply turning the table the wrong way. Bush is merely a guidepost in Time of changes that had to come as result of a generation of aggressive contemporary living and investing (the smaller sense of an obtuse word for self-interest or greed) fueled by exploitation and coffee. We are the Fools, not Bush, because we fail to recognize the urgency of our needs, feeding a planet. The Times is at the pinnacle of our society in anger manipulation, and a low point in self-realization."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)